Managing sequencing risk: Sensible steps to protect retirement portfolios: HLB Mann Judd

Australian Unity Investments wins Australian Property Institute NSW Excellence in Property Award for 2013
October 18, 2013
New head of legal at Tyndall AM
October 30, 2013

Trustees of self managed superannuation funds and investors generally need to take steps to mitigate the potentially destructive impact of sequencing risk on their retirement portfolios, says Chris Hogan, wealth management adviser at HLB Mann Judd Sydney.

Sequencing risk is the risk of receiving a series of poor investment returns at the wrong time, such as when an investment portfolio balance is at its highest level.

“A portfolio is typically at its largest in the five years leading up to retirement and in the five years after commencing retirement. This 10 year period is the ‘danger zone’ for sequencing risk,” Mr Hogan says.

“We saw the destructive impact of sequencing risk on the portfolios of many retirees who were unlucky enough to retire just prior to the onset of the Global Financial Crisis and significant lessons were learnt. While we can not control the order that returns are achieved, we can take steps to mitigate the detrimental impact of sequencing risk.”

The propensity for SMSF trustees to invest large chunks of the investment portfolio into direct property can also exacerbate the impact of sequencing risk, Mr Hogan says.

Regular contributions

Making regular contributions during the accumulation phase is the first step to mitigating the impact of sequencing risk.

“This has the effect of dollar cost averaging into the market. Quite simply, when markets fall, these contributions are used to purchase relatively cheap assets. It also has a positive impact that even if the investment returns for the year have been negative the portfolio balance is still likely to increase.

“In a good year the portfolio powers ahead with the positive returns plus the additional contributions.”

Large account balances

Putting plenty away through regular contributions, and lump sum contributions when cash is available, will build a large portfolio balance irrespective of investment returns.

“Good investment returns cannot work miracles on small amounts of capital.  Too often people complain about not having enough money in retirement due to poor investment returns when in fact not putting enough away was the real culprit.”

While sequencing risk is at its highest for large portfolios the risk is also relatively less for very large portfolios.

“If a retiree has managed to accumulate a very large balance relative to the pension they need to draw from their portfolio each year, an adverse return sequence will have less impact. A large portfolio should have enough capital committed to risky markets at all times for the portfolio to bounce back quite well when markets recover.

“A retiree with a lesser account balance does not have this luxury, often needing to sell risky assets at low prices to fund pension payments.”

Asset buckets

A key measure of protection for those already in the pension phase, this strategy involves segregating risky and secure assets into separate ‘buckets’ in a client’s portfolio.

“This ensures that risky assets are allowed to bubble away in their own segregated bucket for a number of years without being disturbed, regardless of market movements.

“The secure bucket is used to pay for cash outflows such as pension payments and fees. For a retiree there should be at least five years of future cash outflows contained in the secure bucket. In this way, in an extended market downturn a risky asset never need to be sold at a low price in a weak market.

“The lack of a bucket strategy option is one of the key weaknesses of many retail and industry superannuation products.”

Sensible pension drawdowns

HLB Mann Judd recommends sensible pension amounts be drawn from retirement portfolios, subject to satisfying minimum drawdown requirements.

“The rule of thumb is 5% a year or less of the value of the fund,” says Mr Hogan.

“Where clients draw larger pensions, say 10% a year, they become very reliant on achieving very good returns each year to sustain this high-income payment. Due to sequencing risk this can never be guaranteed.”

Minimising large allocations to direct property in SMSFs

Recent reports that trustees of SMSFs have an increased appetite for direct property investment has real implications for sequencing risk.

“Property is a lumpy asset that can take a long time to sell, and property prices can be very adversely affected by market conditions.

“Being in the position of needing to sell a property at a time when the property market is in a slump, is not a position trustees would like to find themselves in, particularly if the property represents a large portion of the SMSF’s total assets,” Mr Hogan says.

HLB Mann Judd Sydney is a firm of accountants and business and financial advisers, and part of the HLB Mann Judd Australasian Association.


For more information please contact:

Chris Hogan – Phone: 02 9020 4216

22 October 2013